This is honestly what I would recommend - just give the mac it's own monitor.The VNC Viewer in the Dameware Remote Support (DRS) software’s Remote Connect dialog makes it easy to connect from Windows OS to Mac OS X and send keyboard and mouse inputs remotely from one computer to the other. I use synergy to share one keyboard/mouse between the PC/Mac. VNC CLIENT FOR MAC OS X 1080PI finally broke down and just bought an inexpensive 24" 1080p HDMI monitor for the mac & a vertical monitor stand so it didn't take up any more desktop space. None of those solutions would let you log in from a reboot though, so it still made it impossible to run headless. I also tried using splashtop for awhile - it actually handled the animations and other stuff in lion the best, but at the expensive of very high cpu usage. There's a 4.0 version of VINE which also works as a more PC compatible VNC server. I used a trial of RealVNC Enterprise as a Lion VNC server (since screen sharing was terrible when connecting from a PC), and it performed acceptably - but I wasn't going to pay for it. Performance (over a 1Gig Ethernet connection) was also pretty terrible, bordering on unusable (much, much, much worse than snow lion). I did have some luck getting RealVNC, TightVNC, and UltraVNC all to connect to screen sharing *after* I had logged in to the local console, but this made running headless awkward at best. The problem seems to be the user login screen - Apple changed how it interacts with screen sharing - so you will not be able to VNC into the mac after a reboot - without logging first at the local console. So I played that game to after picking up a new mac mini (from an old SL iMac). Doesn't really matter, they all work fine. Just turn on screen sharing and use TightVNC, RealVNC, UltraVNC, etc. I need a VNC Server on the OSX side and a PC Client that can connect to it.Įdit: Reading OP fail - just caught you were still on 10.5.8 - everything below applies to lion, but before that just about any windows VNC client works fine. I regularly admin boxes all over the country via ARD, and it is MILES better than it used to be on PPC systems over 256k or ISDN links. I can say though that as Mac CPU's have gotten faster, the experience has gotten a WHOLE lot better. VNC CLIENT FOR MAC OS X CODEMS licensed Citrix's code years ago, and people have been complaining not just about ARD, but VNC in general has always been slower. I consider Apple's not having addressed this years ago a big failing (the solution isn't trivial, as IIRC they'd have to introduce a In fact, accessing a Windows VM via RDP on a WAN is a lot more responsive than using VNC to access the underlying Mac on a gigabit LAN.Īccessing Linux via VNC tend to work a bit better, but still not quite as good as RDP. VNC is almost-usable for GUI work on a 100mbps LAN, while RDP works well on a 1.5mbps WAN. the screen sharing goes) is completely miserableĬompared to MSFT's RDP, even after tweaking the relevant settings. The VNC protocol (ARD uses bog-standard VNC a.f.a. Speaking only about the performance perspective, I've done a lot of benchmarking with this. $85 is a lot of cash for something that other OS vendors provide for free. Is ARD comparable to RDP in terms of performance, usage, etc.? From my perspective, it would have to be a lot better than VNC in just about every respect to justify the cost.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |